home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_833 / 833r023.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  69KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree
OCR: ARGUMENT SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROC ESS IS NOT INFRINGE[) WHENEVER POLICE OFFICER CONTRIBUTES TO THE FIL ING CRIMINAL CHARGE LIOHLIA PROBABLE CAUSE Introduction Before addressing Petitioner's substantive due process theory useful to identify the constitutional claim which was indisputably available ts Petitioner Officer Oliver's alleged arrest of Petitioner without probahle cause aet forth plausible fourth amendment claim based upon an unreasonable seizure (App. 3a}. That claim, how ever was time barred (App 4a Accordingly, Respondenta do not argue that the Civil Rights Act fails K provide rermedy for the conduct com plained Xq J0 Petitioner. Rather the remedy should simply be ir the nature fourth amendment false arrest claim, as opposed to substantive due process claim based upon an implied fun ...